programming4us
programming4us
CAMERA

Go-faster Telephoto Lenses Group Test (Part 3)

- How To Install Windows Server 2012 On VirtualBox
- How To Bypass Torrent Connection Blocking By Your ISP
- How To Install Actual Facebook App On Kindle Fire
Sealing the deal

Build quality is another key factor. All the lenses on test offer a big step up compared with budget lenses, but some go further than others. Weather seals are good to have, especially if you’re at an outdoor event and don’t want your shooting to be hampered because it’s raining. It’s a common misconception that all Canon L-series lenses feature weather seals, but only the two 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses and the 70-200mm f/4 IS lens in this group have dust and moisture seals. Even then, the non-IS 70-200mm f/2.8 lacks a rubber ring in its mounting plate, to stop moisture leaking through the joint between the lens and camera body. Seals aren’t fitted to either of the Sigma lenses or the Tamron lens.

Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM

With its focal length of 400mm on a full-frame camera, and 640mm effective reach on an APS-C body, this is a great lens if you need serious telephoto power. At 1.25kg, it also weighs less than the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses, so is light enough for prolonged handheld use.

Description: Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM

Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM

The maximum aperture of f/5.6 isn’t massively fast for a 400mm lens; Sigma makes a 120-400mm optically stabilised lens that has a variable aperture of f/4.5-5.6. Unlike the Sigma, this lens has no stabiliser, and getting sharp handheld shots at such a long focal length is a major challenge in anything other than the sunniest conditions.

Autofocus speed is quite pedestrian, even though the lens features a ring-type USM system. It’s slower than on the Canon 300mm lens, and very sluggish compared with the other Canon lenses n the group. Image quality is impressive, but as it’s a prime lens you simply can’t zoom to follow the action. A 70-200mm f/2.8 lens with a 2x teleconverter is a more attractive proposition.

Verdict

·         Price: $1,340

·         For: Reasonably light for a 400mm lens; good image quality

·         Against: Sluggish autofocus; relatively slow f/5.6 maximum aperture

 

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

There are plenty of similarities between this lens and the Canon 70-200mm IS on test. They’re pretty much the same size and weight, and both have a dual-mode, four-stop stabiliser, great quality glass and sturdy build quality, and super-fast ring-type ultrasonic autofocus. One notable difference, however, is that the Sigma lacks weather-seals.

Description: Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

Autofocus is virtually silent and only marginally slower than on the blistering Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS. Stabilisation lives up to its four-stop claims, and delivers shake-free handheld shots at slow shutter speeds. Image quality is excellent, with great sharpness and very little distortion or fringing. Contrast is also generally good, but not quite a match for the superlative Canon lens at the maximum aperture of f/2.8.

Handling is refined, with very smooth action of both the zoom and focus rings, while the switches for auto/manual focus and stabiliser modes have a precise feel. The Sigma is a great lens that gives the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS a close run for its money, and at less than half the price.

Verdict

·         Price: $1,200

·         For: Great image quality, autofocus performance and stabilisation

·         Against: Lacks weather-seals; not quite as good as the Canon equivalent

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

Couple a big zoom range of 120-300mm with a big maximum aperture of f/2.8 and you inevitably end up with a big lens, but the Sigma 120-300mm is something of a monster. It’s twice as heavy as the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, much longer and fatter, and has an outsized 105mm filter thread. Unless your other hobby is weightlifting, you won’t want to use this 3kg lens for long stretches without a monopod or tripod. It’s also the heaviest lens on test in terms of outlay, at around $2,700.

Description: Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

What it does give you is the holy grail of long telephoto reach combined with a fast maximum aperture of f/2.8. Other finery includes a four-stop optical stabiliser with dual modes, ring-type ultrasonic autofocus and very sturdy build quality. Autofocus is a bit slow, although slightly quicker than on the Canon 400mm prime lens. Image quality is impressive, but sharpness could be better towards the edges of the frame.

Verdict

·         Price: $2,700

·         For: Class-leading f/2.8 aperture at its long 300mm focal length

·         Against Big and heavy; sharpness falls off towards corners of frame

Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro

This is the cheapest 70-200mm f/2.8 lens in the group by quite a margin. As such, build quality is no match for Canon L-series lenses, but it’s still a reasonably rugged item that should withstand a few knocks. It lacks weather-seals, ultrasonic autofocus and optical stabilisation, so the specifications look a little low-tech.

Description: Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro

Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro

The autofocus system may be of the basic micro-motor variety, but the motor itself is pretty beefy, though quite noisy as well. Autofocus is only a little slower than with most of the lenses on test, and fractionally faster than on the Canon 400mm and Sigma 120-300mm lenses. And while there’s no full-time manual override, at least the focus ring has a push-pull mechanism that enables you to quickly and easily swap between auto and manual focus modes.

Distortions are fairly pronounced, with some noticeable barrel distortion at 70mm and pincushion at 200mm. Sharpness is very respectable, even at large apertures, especially in the central portion of the frame, but there’s a slight lack of contrast when shooting at f/2.8.

Verdict

·         Price: $770

·         For: Decent image quality and a fast max aperture at a budget price

·         Against: Lacks optical stabilisation and ultrasonic autofocus

 

Other  
 
Top 10
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 2) - Wireframes,Legends
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 1) - Swimlanes
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Formatting and sizing lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Adding shapes to lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Sizing containers
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 3) - The Other Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 2) - The Data Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 1) - The Format Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Form Properties and Why Should You Use Them - Working with the Properties Window
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Using the Organization Chart Wizard with new data
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
programming4us programming4us
programming4us
 
 
programming4us