DESKTOP

What’s Wrong With Windows 8?

7/25/2013 2:06:48 PM

...and what we want from Windows 9

While a lot of people rushed to avail of the cheap upgrade to Windows 8, some of us who were pretty content with Windows 7 (and also believing that every alternate Windows is a flop), decide to wait it out. Money saved, is all we will say. See, the problem is, we’re using desktops or laptops (PCs basically) and Microsoft has, in our humble opinion, decided to dump all of us PC users into the nearest sewer.

It’s like this: we PC users, we’re part of a subset of people who Microsoft takes for granted. They hold a monopoly over the PC market, so where will we go? We’ll bitch and moan, cry foul, spew venom at Microsoft, but in the end, we will buy (or pirate) their OSes anyway, because we’re too lazy to learn Linux, and not stupid or rich enough to buy all new hardware in the form of a Mac.

In the end, we will upgrade to Windows 8 by default when we buy a new laptop or to Windows 9 by choice, when the alternate OS jinx takes a breather. We really have no option, and no matter how free you think your choices are, we content creators are really stuck with what Microsoft decides is best for us!

Top 3 ways Windows 8 fails

So let’s list out the top ways in which Windows 8 fails on the PC.

So let’s list out the top ways in which Windows 8 fails on the PC.

So let’s list out the top ways in which Windows 8 fails on the PC.

1.    Intuition

When Windows 95 was launched to the tune of Start me up by the rolling stones, because of the Start button and menu, it was brilliant. Eighteen years later, PC users still want a place to start using a computer from. Vista did away with the word “Start” but still kept the button, as did Windows 7. With Windows 8, you get the word “Start” coming back, but it’s just text; a label for an intro screens that has some “Live tiles” and that’s about it. For the first time ever, in the Windows environment, PC users were left scratching their heads as to how they could, say, launch Photoshop. That’s just dumb.

That’s not all. For years on Windows / Mac and Linux, buttons are designed to look like buttons. There’s a drop shadow, or a beveled look, something. Windows 8 has plain text. You can’t tell what’s meant to be clicked, and what’s not.

What we want: We’re hoping that Windows 9 will bring back the intuition, instead of just expecting people to get used to Windows 8’s warped UI. Stop trying to be two things at once, and choose one or the other. We’re also hoping Windows 9 will label buttons better.

2.    Mix and match - two OSes in one?

When you look at Apple, and what they achieved with iOS. You know it’s because they threw away the Mac OSX interface, and said, “No! Different device, different OS”. Microsoft, some believe, is trying to please everyone by mixing and matching the touch and mouse interfaces for mobile / tablet users and us poor PC chaps, and failing miserably at doing both.

We believe that Microsoft knows damn well what it’s doing. Some figures suggest that there will be 2 billion PCs in use by 2014. PCs, unlike smartphones and tablets, have a longer life, and thus although the sales figures for PCs worldwide may seem to be falling, laptops and desktops aren’t going anywhere just yet. We’re still going to use them, and with Microsoft’s monopoly, most of us are going to use some flavor of Windows for the next 5 years at the minimum.

What would you do if you owned a company that reached 2 billion (at least) people via your software on one platform, and were trying to convert them to your software on another platform? Exactly what Windows 8 did? Even if you have a PC without a touch interface, Microsoft is getting you used to the UI of their touch devices - forcefully. You can’t buy a new laptop / ultra-book without Windows 8 these days, and that means you’re already getting used to their Metro UI. Although you may be cribbing about it now, you will soon get used to it... ask yourself how averse will you be to a tablet or phone that throws up the same UI in, say, two years?

Ahh! Now you’re getting the picture, eh? However, we still believe it’s a big mistake for Microsoft to take its PC users for granted. Think about how you use your devices - your phone (or tablet) has become your main consumption device for content. It’s easy, it’s with you always, and is light. So what if you have a smaller screen to read on, at least you can read while walking, and feel connected all the time.

When you want to sit and work, though, say you need to write out an article or do any serious typing, browse and do research, write code, design something, paint, edit videos, touch up pictures... you go to your laptop / desktop, fire up Windows (or Linux or Mac) and get productive. Microsoft are the productivity kings, and yes, the world is more about fun and consuming content than making it, and yes we will spend $694 on an iPhone if we can afford it, but we’re not yet ready to let go of our PCs. Why? Because we still need to work. In its attempt to get you used to the UIs of their consumption devices, Microsoft is messing with your productivity. If you’re less productive on a PC anyway, why bother with one. Why not a Chromebook? Why not buy a keyboard for your iPad/Android device and get used to working on that. It’s painful, but now, so is Windows 8...

Even if you have a PC without a touch interface, Microsoft is getting you used to the UI of their touch devices - forcefully

Even if you have a PC without a touch interface, Microsoft is getting you used to the UI of their touch devices - forcefully

What we want: For Windows 9, we hope they get back to looking at the platforms for what they are, and give us variants of the OS that are more suited for the device it’s installed on. Why do you need a touch interface on a device with no touchscreen? Even if it’s not a Start menu-driven UI, at least we hope Windows 9 will have two modes – Touch and Type. We don’t expect the two OSes to get separated again (unless there’s a miracle) but we do want an OS that was actually made with a keyboard and mouse in mind for PCs and with touch in mind for tablets / phones.

3.    Touch is the future... is it?

Microsoft seem to have taken it for granted that touch is indeed the future. Apple’s made its billions from touch, so why shouldn’t Microsoft try and compete in the same market? For years, however, Microsoft’s been the king of its castles – office suites and operating systems. However, just as Nintendo came and spoilt the Xbox party with the Wii, Microsoft has to spoil Apple’s party by doing something better... And what do they have that’s better than touch? Microsoft has Kinect. Over the years, when we’ve met Microsoft employees, we’ve always been told that Kinect is their vision of the future. Gesture control for everything. Why touch something when you can wave your hand at it from a distance. Phones may have no use for this, but a PC might. Developing the Kinect further to recognize a nod as a command, or to automatically increase font size if you are squinting... now that’s futuristic

What we want: We’re hoping that Windows 9 will truly change the PC by adding gestures to the existing keyboard and mouse setup, and enhance our input experience. God knows the PC market could use a little change. Windows 8 is not that change because it frustrates you when you don’t have a touch screen. Windows 9 can do this by integrating Kinect.

Windows 9

In Windows 8, the much touted Live Tiles are not really intuitive. For example, when you see changing pictures of friends, if you happen to spot a friend who you had forgotten about, and click their face, it just takes you to the people hub. Now if you want to go to that person, you have to search for them. For these tiles to be really live, or alive, it would be nice for them to link the tile state, so when you click (or tap), you go to what you clicked on. Now it’s not going to be easy to accomplish this, and strictly speaking, it’s really up to the app developer to do this, but in order to show off such functionality, Microsoft has to make it possible first.

Windows 9 really should look at changing things up and perhaps going even further than touch

Windows 9 really should look at changing things up and perhaps going even further than touch

The next most important thing we want from Windows 9 is to forget about the desktop. Yes you heard us. We’d rather Microsoft allow Windows 7 to run for longer, and offer support for it, with patches and service packs and whatnot, just as they did for XP (for a decade). It’s fine. It runs, why bother PC users with a UI made for touch screens? Let touch devices make the most of Metro, without having to revert to a desktop mode for some things, and also give app developers some much needed respite, by making them think for the touch UI only.

We’ve mentioned Kinect earlier in this article, and Windows 9 really should look at changing things up and perhaps going even further than touch. Also, it would be good for Microsoft to finally think about letting the “Windows” badge go, because as people have said before, with Metro, it’s more like “Microsoft Window” anyway, as the ability to launch and run multiple programs at once in multiple “Windows” is going away. Whatever the case, Windows 9 needs to bring sweeping changes, and take some tough decisions if it doesn’t want to be the second failure after Windows 7.

Other  
 
Most View
Best Apps For Your SmartPhones – December 2012 (Part 1)
Aftershock Halo - More Than An Ultrabook
Charging Ahead With AMD’s Kaveri (Part 2)
Thunderbolt - Chain Reaction
Helping Clients Buy What They Want And Love It
Away With The Cloud? (Part 2)
Sharepoint 2013 : Farm Management - Review Farm Configuration Values,Set the Farm Configuration Values
One More Thing: Two New Ipods
Samyang 85mm f1.4 Telephoto Lens Review (Part 3)
Chromebook Pixel - Google’s Unreal Wonder (Part 2)
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
VIDEO TUTORIAL
- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 1)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 2)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 3)
Popular Tags
Microsoft Access Microsoft Excel Microsoft OneNote Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Project Microsoft Visio Microsoft Word Active Directory Biztalk Exchange Server Microsoft LynC Server Microsoft Dynamic Sharepoint Sql Server Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2012 Windows 7 Windows 8 Adobe Indesign Adobe Flash Professional Dreamweaver Adobe Illustrator Adobe After Effects Adobe Photoshop Adobe Fireworks Adobe Flash Catalyst Corel Painter X CorelDRAW X5 CorelDraw 10 QuarkXPress 8 windows Phone 7 windows Phone 8 BlackBerry Android Ipad Iphone iOS
Top 10
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2) - Discharge Smart, Use Smart
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1) - Charge Smart
OPEL MERIVA : Making a grand entrance
FORD MONDEO 2.0 ECOBOOST : Modern Mondeo
BMW 650i COUPE : Sexy retooling of BMW's 6-series
BMW 120d; M135i - Finely tuned
PHP Tutorials : Storing Images in MySQL with PHP (part 2) - Creating the HTML, Inserting the Image into MySQL
PHP Tutorials : Storing Images in MySQL with PHP (part 1) - Why store binary files in MySQL using PHP?
Java Tutorials : Nested For Loop (part 2) - Program to create a Two-Dimensional Array
Java Tutorials : Nested For Loop (part 1)