programming4us
programming4us
SECURITY

Wireless Connections: What You Need To Know (Part 1)

- How To Install Windows Server 2012 On VirtualBox
- How To Bypass Torrent Connection Blocking By Your ISP
- How To Install Actual Facebook App On Kindle Fire
5/17/2014 5:46:30 PM

Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, Miracast and more: Darien Graham-Smith explains each of today's numerous wireless standards

The word “wireless” has meant many things through the years, from radios to infrared to Bluetooth to the alphabet soup of 802.11a, b, c and beyond. Now many people use it as a shorthand for Wi-Fi, but that’s far too simplistic. Wireless protocols are complicated, cryptic and misleading, so it makes sense to arm yourself with some knowledge. Here, we explain all the different “wireless” imposters; if your connection isn’t as reliable as you’d like, read on to discover why.

The word “wireless” has meant many things through the years

The word “wireless” has meant many things through the years

Simple broadcast technologies

The simplest sort of wireless communication is where a device transmits an open signal into the ether, which can be received and understood by any listening device. It’s the way traditional broadcast radio works, and the same radio frequency (RF) technology can be used in hobbyist computing projects where there isn’t a need for secure communications.

For example, in last month’s PC Pro we detailed how to collect data from a Raspberry Pi-based weather station over Wi-Fi. We could alternatively have fitted our Raspberry Pi with a cheap RF transmitter (such as Ciseco’s $17 “Slice of Radio”), and set up a listening PC with an RF receiver to listen to its broadcasts. RF is attractively simple for this type of job: there’s no need to mess around with routers and Wi-Fi passwords, and a tiny radio with a small antenna can broadcast through clear air for up to a kilometre.

The big downside of RF is its susceptibility to interference. If two devices positioned close to one another are broadcasting simultaneously at the same frequency, a listening device probably won’t be able to understand either.

In addition, conventional RF modules offer a comparatively slow transmission speed, of only 250Kbits/sec. Another simple broadcast technology is IrDA, named after the Infrared Data

the Infrared Data USB

The Infrared Data USB

Association, which developed the standard. IrDA encodes data in patterns of infrared light, in much the same way as a television remote control, so although the transmitted data can be received by any device in range, the receiver still has to be within around 5m of the transmitter. For data transfer, infrared has largely been supplanted by Bluetooth, which doesn’t require line of sight and has much greater bandwidth (offering transmission speeds of 25Mbits/sec versus IrDA’s maximum of 4Mbits/sec).

Wireless interconnects

If you buy a wireless keyboard or mouse, it may use Bluetooth, or communicate using radio transmissions in the unregulated 2.4-2.5GHz frequency range. Technically, this is the same type of RF communication as described above, but operating at a much higher frequency. This means that the signal has a shorter range (around 10m is common), especially since the peripherals themselves typically have tiny internal aerials.

That shorter range makes it hard for a would-be spy to get near enough to eavesdrop on your keystrokes. On top of this, modern 2.4GHz-input devices typically use a pairing system, whereby a unique encryption key is shared when you press a physical button on both the keyboard, say, and the receiver.

Even if other devices nearby can “hear” your keystrokes, they won’t be able to decode them, and the bidirectional link also means errors can be detected and re-sent. Support for “channel-hopping” - automatically switching between different transmissions frequencies -ensures that the keyboard and receiver can communicate even when interference is present.

There is an official Wireless USB (WUSB) standard

There is an official Wireless USB (WUSB) standard

Attempts to create more general-purpose wireless interconnects have had a chequered history. There is an official Wireless USB (WUSB) standard, but it was last updated in 2010, and is held back by its speed: theoretically, it should be able to match USB 2’s maximum 480Mbits/sec bandwidth, but in practice you’re unlikely to get anywhere close to that.

 

 

Other  
 
Top 10
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 2) - Wireframes,Legends
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 1) - Swimlanes
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Formatting and sizing lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Adding shapes to lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Sizing containers
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 3) - The Other Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 2) - The Data Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 1) - The Format Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Form Properties and Why Should You Use Them - Working with the Properties Window
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Using the Organization Chart Wizard with new data
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
programming4us programming4us
programming4us
 
 
programming4us