ENTERPRISE

SSD Supertest – December 2012 (Part 6)

12/18/2012 3:28:09 PM

Performance, speed and reliability

Every time we think we've cracked this SSD testing lark, it just gets tougher.

In the early days, it was all about raw sequential grunt. Then it became clear that drives performed differently with compressible and incompressible data, so that had to be factored in.

Of course, real-world PC performance depends on much more than mere sequential throughput, so random access performance was stirred into the mix. Bung in some actual application tests and we were beginning to think we had a pretty good feel for overall drive performance.

And so we were, but only at a given moment in time, and a given state of drive usage and wear. Unfortunately, the reality is that fully torture-testing every solid-state drive we review to destruction is impractical. We'd need months if not years with each drive, and by the time we finally published our results, the model in question would probably have disappeared.

However, what we've added to our standard battery of tests this time around is an extra endurance test. We always fill and then empty each drive of data before testing, but this time we added another two fill and delete cycles, then compared the drives before and after performance. The results are certainly interesting.

 

 

Winner is...

OCZ Vertex 4 256GB

Things change fast in SSD land. A year ago, it was all about previously little known outfit SandForce. Today, SandForce isn't exactly dead, but the competition is significantly more lively.

OCZ Vertex 4 256GB

What's really interesting, however, is the mix of players and technologies involved. On one hand you have the likes of Samsung, the mega beast of tech, pushing the envelope with its new triple-level cell memory and fourth generation in house controller. On the other, you've got relative minnow OCZ cooking up a remarkably competitive alternative with its own Indilinx controller technology. Then there's a whole bevy of players pulling together interesting SSDs using a mix of off-the-shelf tech and some agile thinking.

It's all very different from CPUs and graphics cards, where two major players dominate the key technologies. For the most part, that makes the SSD market more fun, vibrant and competitive.

Test of time

But there's another side to the wild west of SSDs, and that’s the frustrating fact that performance and reliability remain patchy. With the best will in the world, it's hard to know how reliable any SSD is going to be, or how well its performance will hold up with heavy usage.

To be clear, a lot of progress has been made. The awful, stuttery drives of a few years ago are history, but we’re not yet at the point where SSDs just work where you can choose based on simple metrics of price and performance.

Choosing a pecking order for this batch of SSDs isn't easy, but a few are immediately defenestrated due to wonky performance numbers or silly pricing. The first to go is KingSpec's epic 1TB PCIe card. In some tests it delivers the 2GB/s goods. In others, it's slower than a $112 SSD. That's not nearly good enough given the $1600 sticker.

Other losers are the Plextor M5 Pro, KingSpec E3000 and Corsair Neutron GTX. Whatever you say about them and the Plextor and Corsair are good drives they're simply too expensive. Kingston's HyperX BK takes an early bath due to poor application performance.

From here on in, the competition is very close. In fact, it's even closer than our scoring suggests. That's because we've included a wide range of metrics in our reckoning. But it's entirely legitimate, for instance, to favour reliability above all else, in which case an older, proven drive not in this group like Samsung's 830 might get the nod.

With that in mind, you might find Intel's 330 Series compelling. Nobody does more validation work than Intel. Then again. Corsair's Neutron balances performance and price pretty nicely, as does Samsung's new 840, though you’d arguably give Samsung the benefit of the doubt regards reliability.

That leaves us with two drives: Sammy’s new 840 Pro and the OCZ Vertex 4. If there’s ever been a tighter finish on a group test here on PC Format, we can’t remember it.

You can make strong arguments for both drives. The 840 Pro is super quick and comes with Samsung's outstanding record for SSD endurance, but the Vertex 4 is even quicker, and dirt cheap. The choice comes down to your attitude towards risk. The Vertex 4 has a five-year warranty, so if the worst happens, you're covered. But a loss of data can be worse than the cost of a drive, and we have first-hand experience of failing Vertex 4s.

So good is the Vertex 4’s performance (and that includes our endurance test), we feel compelled to give it top honours, but even so we still find it hard to ignore an older, proven SSD. You pays your money. You takes your choice.

 

Corsair Neutron 240GB

Corsair Neutron GTX240GB

Intel 330 Series 180GB

KingSpec Challenge E3000240GB

KingSpec PCIe MultiCorelTB

Manufacturer

Corsair

Corsair

Intel

KingSpec

KingSpec

Web

www.corsair.com

www.corsair.com

www.intel.com

www.kingspec.com

www.kingspec.com

Price

$256

$304

$164.8

$281.6

$1720

Capacity

240GB

240GB

180GB

240GB

1TB

Memory type

MLC synchronous

MLC toggle

MLC synchronous

MLC synchronous

MLC synchronous

Controller

Link A Media LM87800

Link A Media LM87800

SandForce 5F-2281

SandForce SF-2281

SandForce SF-1200 x8

Claimed endurance

2m hours MTBF

2m hours MTBF

1.2m hours MTBF

1.3m hours MTBF

2m hours MTBF

Warranty

5yrs

5yrs

3yrs

2yrs

2yrs

 

 

Kingston HyperX

120GB

OCZ Vertex 4 256GB           

Plextor MS Pro 128GB

Samsung 840 250GB

Samsung 840 Pro 256GB

Manufacturer

Kingston

OCZ

Plextor

Samsung

Samsung

Web

www.kingston.com

www.ocztechnology.com

www.plextor-digital.com

www.samsung.com

www.samsung.com

Price

$124.8

$246.4

$204.8

$256

$334.4

Capacity

120GB

256GB

128GB

250GB

256GB

Memory type

MLC synchronous

MLC synchronous

MLC toggle

TLC toggle

MLC toggle

Controller

SandForceSF-2281

Indilinx Everest 2

Marvell 885S9187

Samsung MDX

SamsungMDX

Claimed endurance

1m hours MTBF

2m hours MTBF

2.4m hours MTBF

1.5m hours MTBF

1.5mhoursMTBF

Warranty

3yrs

5yrs

5yrs

3yrs

5yrs

 

Other  
 
Top 10
Review : Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art
Review : Canon EF11-24mm f/4L USM
Review : Creative Sound Blaster Roar 2
Review : Philips Fidelio M2L
Review : Alienware 17 - Dell's Alienware laptops
Review Smartwatch : Wellograph
Review : Xiaomi Redmi 2
Extending LINQ to Objects : Writing a Single Element Operator (part 2) - Building the RandomElement Operator
Extending LINQ to Objects : Writing a Single Element Operator (part 1) - Building Our Own Last Operator
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2) - Discharge Smart, Use Smart
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
VIDEO TUTORIAL
- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 1)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 2)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 3)
Popular Tags
Microsoft Access Microsoft Excel Microsoft OneNote Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Project Microsoft Visio Microsoft Word Active Directory Biztalk Exchange Server Microsoft LynC Server Microsoft Dynamic Sharepoint Sql Server Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2012 Windows 7 Windows 8 Adobe Indesign Adobe Flash Professional Dreamweaver Adobe Illustrator Adobe After Effects Adobe Photoshop Adobe Fireworks Adobe Flash Catalyst Corel Painter X CorelDRAW X5 CorelDraw 10 QuarkXPress 8 windows Phone 7 windows Phone 8