HARDWARE

The Contemporary APUs - AMD Trinity vs Intel Ivy Bridge (Part 7)

5/31/2013 5:54:25 PM

Application performance

To test the processors performance during data archiving we resort to WinRAR archiving utility. Using maximum compression rate we archive a folder with a lot of files with 1.1GB of storage.

WinRAR archive using maximum compression rate

WinRAR archive using maximum compression rate

The latest WinRAR runs fine on the multi-core processors, but quad-core Trinity APU is somewhat slower than the dual-core Core i3 CPUs that support Hyper-Threading. On the other hand, A10 and A8 series are much faster than the Pentium and Celeron CPUs which are being ahead of the AMD's A4 and A6 in terms of data compression speed.

To test audio transcoding performance, we use the Nero AAC Encoder 1.5.1.0 to convert a grabbed CD into the AAC format. This encoder (like the majority of tools for converting audio files) generates single-threaded load only.

Check out audio transcoding performance using Nero AAC Encoder 1.5.1.0

Check out audio transcoding performance using Nero AAC Encoder 1.5.1.0

Piledriver microarchitecture used in modern AMD processors cannot provide competitive single-threaded performance. Intel's solution is faster for such loads. As you can see, encoding audio goes faster on the dual-core Celeron than on the quad-core A10 which is 50% faster in terms of clock rate and 50% more expensive to the bargain.

Web application performance was benchmarked using RoboHornet, a browser test that makes use of all modern resource-consuming web technologies. This test was run on Google Chrome 24.

Web application performance was benchmarked using RoboHornet

Web application performance was benchmarked using RoboHornet

Current web browsers are known to support multi-core CPUs but only formally. For example, even though each Chrome tab is processed as a separate instruction thread, the web application or page in the forefront will only use one CPU core. Trinity series can not be expected to offer high performance under such conditions, so Ivy Bridge processors crunch through the single-threaded load much faster.

We benchmark CPUs in Adobe Photoshop CS6 with custom test based on the Retouch Artists Photoshop Speed Test, and consists of typical processing of four 24-megapixel images captured with a digital camera.

Benchmarking CPU in Adobe Photoshop CS6 CPU with custom test

Benchmarking CPU in Adobe Photoshop CS6 CPU with custom test

AMD's hybrid APU also can not show off its high performance in Adobe Photoshop, even this well-known photo editing applications usually create multi-threaded loads. Again, we see that the fastest processor for Socket FM2 platform is slower than the Celeron G1620, one of the junior products of the LGA1155 platform based on the microarchitecture iv.

In order to measure how fast our testing participants can transcode a video into H.264 format we used x264 FHD Benchmark 1.0.1 (64 bit). It works with an original MPEG-4/AVC video, recorded in 1920x1080 @ 50fps resolution with 30 Mbps bitrate.I have to say that the results of this test are great practical value, because the x264 code is also very much a part of popular transcoding utilities, such as HandBrake, MEGui, VirtualDub, ...

Measuring how fast our testing participants can transcode a video into H.264 format

Measuring how fast our testing participants can transcode a video into H.264 format

Video transcoding is one of the few scenarios where Piledriver microarchitecture can be the best. AMD's quad-core solutions are ahead of the Core i3 this time, about 15%, if we compare the flag-ship A10-5800K with the similarly priced Core i3-3220. Trinity dual-core modifications do not share their success with their quad-core brothers, lagging behind both the Pentium and Celeron.

We use special Cinebench 11.5 benchmark to test final rendering speed in Maxon Cinema 4D suite.

Using special Cinebench 11.5 benchmark to test rendering speed

Using special Cinebench 11.5 benchmark to test rendering speed

Rendering is another types of multi-threaded computing load which is mostly done on the CPU’s integer subunits. It is in such situations that the senior Trinity modifications can challenge the Core i3 series. However, they do not have any significant advantages at this point even under such favorable conditions. The senior APU A10 series are just as fast as the junior members of the Core i3 series. The APU A8 series are somewhere between Core i3 and Pentium serires, just like in the other tests.

The next diagram shows one of the intermediate results of the Futuremark 3DMark11 benchmark – Physics Score. This score shows how fast the testing participants can cope with a special physics test - emulating the behavior of a complex system with a large number of objects.

The intermediate results of the Futuremark 3DMark11 benchmark – Physics Score

The intermediate results of the Futuremark 3DMark11 benchmark – Physics Score

Although this load can be easily distributed on the multi-core processors, the AMD A10 and A8 processors with twice the number of x86 cores available in their Intel opponents cannot show a high result. The weakness of the Trinity design is that each dual-core Piledriver module contains only one floating-point subunit which are required for physics processing. That's why the Core i3 series are faster than quad-core processors of the Socket FM2 platform while the dual core A4 and A6 APUs are inferior in terms of speed with the modern model from the Pentium and Celeron series.

 

 

Other  
 
Most View
Windows Server 2008 R2 networking : Planning and Deploying DHCP (part 2) - Deploying DHCP
Maingear Alpha 24 Super Stock - No Retreat, No Surrender
Sharepoint 2010 : The Search User Interface - The People Search Page (part 1) - People Search Options
How To Plan Home Improvements In 3D (Part 2)
AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB vs. AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB (Part 2)
The Best Apps and Gear of 2012 (Part 1)
Timex Ironman Run Trainer 2.0
Shared photo streams
Plantronics Voyager Legend Bluetooth Headset
Synology DS413j NAS Box – Typical Four-Drive Solution
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
VIDEO TUTORIAL
- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 1)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 2)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 3)
Popular Tags
Microsoft Access Microsoft Excel Microsoft OneNote Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Project Microsoft Visio Microsoft Word Active Directory Biztalk Exchange Server Microsoft LynC Server Microsoft Dynamic Sharepoint Sql Server Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2012 Windows 7 Windows 8 Adobe Indesign Adobe Flash Professional Dreamweaver Adobe Illustrator Adobe After Effects Adobe Photoshop Adobe Fireworks Adobe Flash Catalyst Corel Painter X CorelDRAW X5 CorelDraw 10 QuarkXPress 8 windows Phone 7 windows Phone 8 BlackBerry Android Ipad Iphone iOS
Top 10
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2) - Discharge Smart, Use Smart
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1) - Charge Smart
OPEL MERIVA : Making a grand entrance
FORD MONDEO 2.0 ECOBOOST : Modern Mondeo
BMW 650i COUPE : Sexy retooling of BMW's 6-series
BMW 120d; M135i - Finely tuned
PHP Tutorials : Storing Images in MySQL with PHP (part 2) - Creating the HTML, Inserting the Image into MySQL
PHP Tutorials : Storing Images in MySQL with PHP (part 1) - Why store binary files in MySQL using PHP?
Java Tutorials : Nested For Loop (part 2) - Program to create a Two-Dimensional Array
Java Tutorials : Nested For Loop (part 1)