Technical data
Model:
M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f2.0
Price:
$1,110
Web:
www.olympus.co
Phone: 0800
1114 888
Elements/construction: 11/8
Angle of view: 84 degrees
Max aperture: f2.0
Min aperture: f22
Min focus distance: 0.2m
Mount: Micro
four thirds
Filter size:
46mm
Length: 56mm
Diameter:
43mm
Weight: 130g
Features
Taken
wih Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f2.0 lens on Panasonic
Definition
Central definition is excellent throughout
the aperture range (with the exception of diffraction from f8), however the
outer field falls some way behind in fine detail.
Distortion
A good deal of the 12mm’s distortion is
corrected in-camera (on both JPEGs and RAW files) but there’s still a little
curvature in the upper window frame.
Flare
The 12mm handles veiling glare (flare)
pretty well but it’s not totally immune, and if the sun strikes the front
element obliquely ghosting can be seen.
DOF scale
The 12mm is unique among MFT lenses for its
maximum aperture and for its DOF scale focusing, shown here with the focus ring
in its rear position.
Hood
Even at this price the 12mm doesn’t come
with a hood. At around $90 the metal LH-48 is a costly and rather bulky option,
but you’d be well advised to consider it.
Chromatic aberration
Some fringing and lateral chromatic
aberration is visible at the edges of the frame but levels are low and can be
easily removed.
How lenses are tested
Test
results – tested on a Panasonic DMC-GH2, mounted on a tripod, shooting
max-quality JPEG at ISO 160
We use an image-analysis application called
Imatest Pro (www.imatest.com) to test the
resolution of lenses. Photos of specially designed test charts are taken in
controlled and consistent conditions at a range of focal lengths and apertures.
These are analysed for sharpness at the centre and edge. The average of these
two figures is used for the final resolution figure.
Resolution is quoted in ‘line
widths/picture height’, which is the number of lines that can be resolved
within the height of the picture. This is different to ‘lines per millimetre’
figures, because they only apply to a single negative size/format (typically
35mm). Digital camerashas different sensor sizes, which mean different
enlargement ratios for prints and hence different ‘Imp’ requirements for
lenses. Line widths/picture height measurements sidestep this and relate
resolution to the final image instead.
Lenses don’t just ‘stop’ resolving
progressively finer detail – they resolve it at lower and lower contrast. In
the past, photographers have disagreed about when detail becomes too ‘soft’ to
count. Imatest gets round this by using modulation transfer frequency (MTF)
analysis and can define a cut-off point for resolution. This is called ‘MTF50’,
or the point where the contrast falls to 50%.
The resolution figures are also dependent
on the camera used. Different SLRs have different resolutions, different
strength low-pass (anti-moire) filters over the sensor and different processing
and sharpening algorithms. The same lens tested on different cameras will yield
different results.