WEBSITE

What’s Gone Wrong With Google? (Part 1)

6/26/2013 3:45:17 PM

It wasn’t long ago that Google was everyone’s favorite Internet Company. So what’s gone wrong? We investigate.

A few years ago, Google couldn’t put a foot wrong. It was everything its competitors weren’t. Unlike cartoon villains Microsoft, the comically incompetent luddites at Yahoo!, and the all-assimilating monoculture of Apple, Google projected an image of being friendly, cutting edge and diverse. Best of all, it gave everything away for free.

 
What’s Gone Wrong With Google?

What’s Gone Wrong With Google?

The company’s success seemed unstoppable, almost from Day 1. Google’s search product was so successful it became a verb. Google’s mail product transformed the webmail landscape, turning 20 MB inboxes into 20GB ones. Google Adwords did something that seemed almost impossible: it made adverts relevant to the people viewing them.

With an unprecedented level of control over the online marketplace, it seemed as though Google would have struggled to make a mistake even if it tried. The company launched more and more products that supplanted the competition, offering cost-free access in exchange for data about each user’s behavior, which was used both to improve the product and sell businesses the access they needed to potential customers. Google maps supplanted all other online mapping products. Google Chrome turned the two-horse browser market into a three-horse race. Its Android operating system took on Apple in the smartphone market, and is providing credible resistance in the tablet arena

Google Adwords did something that seemed almost impossible: it made adverts relevant to the people viewing them.

Google Adwords did something that seemed almost impossible: it made adverts relevant to the people viewing them.

“It seemed as though Google would have struggled to make a mistake even if it tried”

Recently, though, things seem to have started going wrong. A succession of thigh-profile failures, botched redesigns and (most gallingly) the closure of perfectly operational services has left many feeling as though Google’s credo – “Don’t be evil” – might not necessarily reflect its attitude towards customers anymore, if it ever did.

To try and make sense of what’s going on, we’ve gathered together a selection of Google’s recent ( and not so recent) failures to try and understand what happened, why, and how each contributes to a growing impression that Google is making more mistakes than it should, given how many of us rely on it of our continued day-to-day existence online.

Google Wave’s Goodbye

In many ways, Google Wave was the product that signaled too many of us that Google’s honeymoon period was well and truly over. Its failure remains one of the company’s most high-profile missteps, and part of a one-two punch that also saw Google Buzz launch and flop almost immediately afterwards. Controversy over Street View’s privacy breaches was unusual for Google, but it didn’t, at first, hint at any bigger problem with the company’s public profile. Then Wave happened.

 
Google Wave was the product that signaled too many of us that Google’s honeymoon period was well and truly over.

Google Wave was the product that signaled too many of us that Google’s honeymoon period was well and truly over.

When Google Wave invites first became available in late 2009, they were selling on eBay for triple-figure sums. Google itself made bold claims about the service, even going so far as to suggest that so-called ‘Waves’ were eventually going to replace email. Unfortunately, once people had a Wave account, they didn’t actually know what to do with it. Waves, with their collaborative access and real-time editing, weren’t quite emails weren’t quite chat, and weren’t quite documents. No one was really sure what they were. Accordingly, people tried them once and never again.

Perhaps the service was ahead of its time. Perhaps it was a solution looking for a problem. Or perhaps it was badly designed, unintuitive and seemingly pointless. Whichever theory you subscribe to, Google knew a bad call when they saw one. Wave development stopped so fast that anyone trying to use it would have gotten whiplash; luckily, hardly anyone was. The official shutdown date came in August 2010, less than 3 months after Wave went on general release, and the project was handed over to the Apache Software Foundation in December 2010.

 Unfortunately, once people had a Wave account, they didn’t actually know what to do with it

Unfortunately, once people had a Wave account, they didn’t actually know what to do with it

In a wider context, it wasn’t so much the speed of Wave’s failure that was a problem, or the fact of it. Rather, it was the profile of it. Google Wave was a big deal, but all it did was cause headaches for everyone involve3d. If a product as desirable and well-promoted as Wave could fail, what Google launch couldn’t? Even then, observers began to note that company hadn’t released a product that ad met with anything approaching universal acclaim since Google Maps in 2005, so it needed it next one to be big.

Buzz off

Launched in the wake of Google Wave’s failing open beta, Google’s first attempt to start a social networking product took the name Buzz. The idea was to create a micro-blogging and social sharing service that could rival the likes of Facebook and Twitter. It’s fair to say that the reality did not meet those expectations.

Perhaps hoping to avoid the excessive hype which made Wave seem like such a letdown, Google didn’t tease Buzz out with an extended beta or the artificial scarcity of an invite system. Instead, it made Buzz available to every Gmail user right from the very moment it was ready to launches. Which, as it turned out, didn’t’ make people very happy. Indeed, rather than creating interest and excitement, it elicited the opposite reaction from any users, who rejected the intrusive and unfamiliar Buzz before they’d even tried it.

The problem wasn’t the product, but its creator’s attitude and actions. The company automatically created accounts for Buzz without ever asking if people actually wanted one. It was a cynical, untrustworthy and transparently self-interested move. It didn’t help that Buzz had incredibly poor and hard to understand privacy settings, that lead many people to react rather angrily to finding out that things they were doing online were now being shared with everyone they’d ever emailed, regardless of any relationship or familiarity.

One class action lawsuit and a Federal Trade Commission settlement later you can bet Google wouldn’t put the launch of Buzz at the top of its list of successes anytime soon. The service never recovered, and it was closed less than two years after its launch, in December 2011.

 
Gmail’s new compose email pop-up is slight and flimsy, qualities it shares with Google’s justification for introducing it.

Gmail’s new compose email pop-up is slight and flimsy, qualities it shares with Google’s justification for introducing it.

Again, the inadequacy of Google Buzz wasn’t the problem – it was Google’s willingness to foist the service upon users without adequately consulting them. In a year when Facebook was taking a beating for its poor privacy settings, that Google could launch a service that treated users just as poorly (in fact, worse) was an eye-opener. Maybe Google wasn’t the big, friendly organization it was trying to look like. Maybe it was just another company.

Perhaps it’s obvious now, but at the time that idea was a surprise. Google screwing up two high-profile launches so close to one another was almost unthinkable and the company’s weaknesses had never been more apparent than during the launches of Buzz. With that in mind, it’s no surprise that the arrival of Google Plus was treated with suspicion and disinterest; even several years later, Buzz’s memory still stings.

The inadequacy of Google Buzz wasn’t the problem- it was Google’s willingness to foist the service upon users”

Other  
 
Top 10
Review : Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art
Review : Canon EF11-24mm f/4L USM
Review : Creative Sound Blaster Roar 2
Review : Philips Fidelio M2L
Review : Alienware 17 - Dell's Alienware laptops
Review Smartwatch : Wellograph
Review : Xiaomi Redmi 2
Extending LINQ to Objects : Writing a Single Element Operator (part 2) - Building the RandomElement Operator
Extending LINQ to Objects : Writing a Single Element Operator (part 1) - Building Our Own Last Operator
3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2) - Discharge Smart, Use Smart
REVIEW
- First look: Apple Watch

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 1)

- 3 Tips for Maintaining Your Cell Phone Battery (part 2)
VIDEO TUTORIAL
- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 1)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 2)

- How to create your first Swimlane Diagram or Cross-Functional Flowchart Diagram by using Microsoft Visio 2010 (Part 3)
Popular Tags
Microsoft Access Microsoft Excel Microsoft OneNote Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Project Microsoft Visio Microsoft Word Active Directory Biztalk Exchange Server Microsoft LynC Server Microsoft Dynamic Sharepoint Sql Server Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2012 Windows 7 Windows 8 Adobe Indesign Adobe Flash Professional Dreamweaver Adobe Illustrator Adobe After Effects Adobe Photoshop Adobe Fireworks Adobe Flash Catalyst Corel Painter X CorelDRAW X5 CorelDraw 10 QuarkXPress 8 windows Phone 7 windows Phone 8